the case in which the Supreme Court held in May that a plan’s actuary may calculate an employer’s withdrawal liability using actuarial assumptions adopted after the measurement date.
Wednesday, July 8, 2026
№ 4Court Decisions (1)·Retirement Plans (3)·Leave & Time Off (1)·Case Commentary (1)·Also Noteworthy (2)
Court Decisions (1)
Retirement Plans (3)
Trump Accounts, a new tax-advantaged individual retirement account (IRA) intended for the benefit of minor children, were established under Internal Revenue Code (Code) Section 530A as part of the
Analysis of nearly 58,000 retirement plans over 16 years concludes that defined contribution plans without alternative investments delivered higher returns than defined benefit plans with significant
Auto-enrollment is one of those retirement plan features that sounds wonderfully simple in a sales presentation. “We’ll automatically enroll employees, boost participation, and help people save.”
Leave & Time Off (1)
For years, employers in the Washington metropolitan area could treat paid family and medical leave as a “somewhere else” problem, an issue for companies with workforces in California, New York, or
Case Commentary (1)
The United States Supreme Court recently held in M&K Employee Solutions, LLC et al. v. Trustees of the IAM National Pension Fund that the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”)
Also Noteworthy (2)
More recordkeepers are seeing pooled employer plans as a tool for future business growth
Newly released International Foundation survey data revealed key trends for glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) drug coverage for U.S. corporate employers.